All of these substances are then capable of transmitting an electric
current, and are therefore good electric conductors.
At the opposite end, we find insulators, i.e. materials lacking any
amount of free charges and therefore incapable of transmitting a
current. In between, there are semiconductors, materials that
are neither very good conductors nor perfect insulators.
Even among conductors, there are variations in the ability to carry
electric currents. These variations will depend both on the type of material,
and on the configuration of the conductor : the same way that a large pipe
can carry much more water than a small pipe, a thick copper wire will carry
much more current than a thin one.
The human body, given its high contents of fluids, is a rather good conductor
(after all the inner functioning of the body is controlled by small electric
pulses), while the skin, as long as it is dry, is a reasonably good insulator.
The opposition exerted by a material to the flow of current is called the
electrical resistance and its inverse, i.e. the ease of transmitting
a current, electrical conductivity. What is the source of resistivity?
What impedes, for instance, the flow of electrons within a metal?
As they move along the body of a conductor, electrons collide with
the particles of the material they are crossing, and in each collision they
transfer some of their energy to the hit molecules. In doing so, the organized
motion of the electrons is transformed into random molecular motion:
as a current flows through a conductor, some of the electric energy
is dissipated into thermal energy.
We can compare this effect to that of motion in presence of friction : when
moving on a frictionless surface, a body in motion would continue moving
indefinitely, but the presence of friction gradually transforms the body's
kinetic energy into heat.
This transformation of electrical energy into "molecular
agitation" might be the desired goal, as in an electric heater or a light
bulb. On the other side, it is highly undesireable when the goal is to transmit
electrical energy over long distances. In a power line, a large amount of energy is wasted due to
resistive losses along the high voltage cables.
For many years, science and technology felt that this was a necessary price to
pay, until some new discovery came into the scene.
SUPERCONDUCTIVITY
Thanks to superconductivity, one can run very high currents, that, in
the normal conductivity regime, would be impossible to reach since they would
overheat and melt the conductor. The potential of such a phenomenon for
practical applications is in principle very large, but there are some
difficulties:
MAGNETIC PROPERTIES of MATERIALS
Question: which of the following statements is not true? (you can give more
than one answer if you believe there is more than one untruth)
It is then a fact that magnetic fields are generated by charges in motion. In
fact, as we will now realize, all magnetic fields are due to charge motion.
Note : I will not try to explain, nor I will expect you to know, how
superconductivity works. It is enough if you understand what it is and what is
its potential importance. You can skip the bottom half of page 358.
Under normal conditions, one can try to minimize the losses due to resistivity,
but one cannot eliminate them completely. A completely new phenomenon appears
at very low temperatures, typically near the absolute zero.
Reminder from Phys 101 : theory and experiment have shown that there is
a limit on how low a temperature a body can have. Such a limit is called
absolute zero and it corresponds to -273 degrees centigrades.
Absolute temperatures are measured in Kelvins : 0 K = absolute zero =
-2730 C
It was oserved in 1911 (and the theoretical model to explain the phenomenon did
not arrive until the '50s) that many conductors, when kept below a temperature
of a few Kelvins, exhibit completely different electrical properties and are
capable of carrying a current without any resistive losses ; this effect was
called superconductivity.
This behaviour opens up an incredible amount of potential applications. As an
example, once a current is established (e.g. with a battery) in a
superconductive circuit, the current will keep flowing even if the battery is
removed.
TECHNICAL QUESTION : how can one keep a circuit at a temperature near absolute
zero?
ANSWER : keep it immersed in a bath of liquid Helium (Helium boiling point =
4 K). This is in principle feasible, but it is neither practical nor economical
, since it takes a fair amount of machinery to produce liquid Helium. To date,
superconductivity has seen applications in limited fields, -high energy particle
accelerators, medical Magnetic Resonance Imaging- where very high magnetic
fields are required, and where the substantial equipment required to liquefy
Helium can be afforded.
Very recently (1986) a major breakthrough has occurred : two Swiss researchers
found a new class of ceramic-like materials (therefore unlikely candidates
for being conductors) that exhibit superconductivity at much higher temperatures
, as high as 160 K. These "High Temperature Superconductors" have already passed
an important threshold, represented by the boiling point of Nitrogen, i.e. 77 K.
Given that it is much more easy and economical to produce liquid Nitrogen than
liquid Helium, the field of High Temperature Superconductivity has the potential
for a vast array of very interesting applications. Still, it might take a few
decades before we see its widespread utilization.
We have just said that high (superconducting) currents can be used to generate
strong magnetic fields, this is then a good moment to re-examine magnetism, and
understand its origins at the atomic level.
A an electric charge at rest generates a magnetic field
B an electric charge at rest is affected by a magnetic
field
C a moving charge generates a magnetic field
D a moving charge is affected by a magnetic field
E an electric current generates a magnetic field
F an electric current is affected by a magnetic field
Thinking of the structure of matter at the atomic level, we can see that
an electron orbiting around the nucleus is behaving like a microscopic current
loop. Any orbiting electron will therefore generate a tiny magnetic field.
Each atomic electron behaves like a mini-magnet, but, in general, all of the
individual magnetic fields associated with each electron will be oriented
randomly, therefore no net magnetic field is observed.
On the other side, there is a class of materials that behaves differently :
in several iron-like metals (Iron, Nickel, Cobalt), atoms have the capability
of organizing themselves into groups (called magnetic domains) with
the same orientation of the field within a group. Moreover, when immersed in
a strong enough magnetic fields, all of the domains can rearrange themselves
in the direction of the field, and this will cause the whole material to behave
like a magnet (and therefore to be attracted by a magnet). Turning off the
field, the iron will soon return to its original state of randomly oriented
domains.
Finally, in some even more special case, all of the domains are frozen in an
aligned status (this can happen when a melted metal is gradually cooled down
in the presence of a strong magnetic field). In this case the magnetization
of the material is permanent, we are then dealing with the familiar
permanent magnets.