This investigation arose from my course
Physics of the Human Bodyespecially the part where I try to
explain the musculoskeletal system and the energetics of various activities,
such as walking, running, pole
vaulting, etc.
I discovered that many things I read in the literature did not make sense. So for
several years I have been trying to understand these matters in a simple
way (joke). I will be reporting on a recent
attempt to understand them in a complicated way.
I also spent much time trying to find animated video footage of various animals,
with little success:
I would search on, say, giraffe, run and get straight to a porn site.
If I tried camel, run bingo! the same site.
Finally, by luck,
I discovered an old movie with good footage, starring a Duke, although I think he was not
actually related to the Royal Family.
Nature of muscle tissue: C.J. Pennycuick Newton Rules Biology (Oxford, 1992out of print); D.J. Aidley, The Physiology of Excitable Cells (Cambridge, 1998)
Striated muscle
Each cross-bridge exerts 5.3´10-12 Nt
over a distance of about 40 Å, giving DE » 0.13 eV per bond. This is about 5 kBT, as it better be!
Theoretical considerations: There is energy loss µ v² at each walking step, and the frequency of stepping is µ v.
Conversely, the force at each running step is constant, µ mg ; hence the specific power for each gait is
where L is a constant.
Do theoretical results make sense?
Energy per unit mass consumed in walking
increases like v².
(But note
effect of optimum strain rate
y.)
Margaria, et al. (1963) measured O2 consumption of athletes on a treadmill.
Since O2 and (food)-energy consumption are 1-1, we see that theory is
verified by the data.
Walk ® run transition is effected by need
to economize the way power increases with speed. At some speed the linear
increase in running beats the cubic increase in walking.
The virtue of running is you increase your stride length
s while keeping constant your
stepping frequency f.
Why mice don't juggle: The time to get neural impulses to/from their muscles scales as l, whereas the falling time scales as l½. But the time brain centers require to process visual information is the same as for us. This means mouse effective reflex time is 5075% of human, but available time is < 20% . They've run out of time.
Empirics of stepping frequency vs. leg length: f µ l½
Is stepping frequency the same as pendulum frequency? (NOOO! see table again)
IMHO, the whole pendulum argument is Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.
In that case, why is f µ l½ ? IMO it is like Kleiber's Law, arising from a compromise
in this case, between strength/weight ratio and need for speed.
Time in the air vs. stepping period
t = 1/f:
This means that at some size an animal will not have enough time to cycle its legs while it is off the ground. Max. air time is 0.40.7 seconds. This means a stepping frequency of at least 1.4 Hz is needed. According to Pennycuick, then, the longest-legged galloping animal will have legs about 2 ±0.4 m. Thus we get an upper limit of 2.4 m for an animal to be able to run.