Copernicus Brahe Kepler
![](ball_red.gif)
Discussion lead by Kristen Knecht, Andrew Leyva and Rhea Noziglia
- We started from a general discussion with the transition from society
in the middle ages to the emergence of a new class: the bourgeoisy
- At the same time the Christian Church is undergoing a transformation from a merely
theological center to a political power center
- The two key figures in this transformation are Charlemagne and pope Gregorio VII
- Power is exerted by also by creating a class of functionaries, the clergy, that are well
educated. The educated language is Latin
- The first Universities (Bologna, Oxford, Padova ...) are created and cultural centers
are transformed. Women convents, lead by famous abbasses,
lose power and influence: the figure of the new functionary
is essentially a man.
- In year 2002 Latin is still not a dead language and it is used in many instances by the
Catholic Church
- As the new bourgeois class gains economical and political power, it seeks for legitimation
from the religious authorities
- This combination of historical, political and cultural events has the effect of pushing out
the vast majority of population from the control of power
- In particular women are excluded from the making of culture,
as the concept of celibate clergy and of
celibate professorship, become dominant at the newly formed Universities
- Not being allowed to have their own children, the educated men cannot even
teach their daughters like in the case of Hypatia
- We then focused on the development of physics and of the scientific thought in general
- Pythagora's approach to science gradually replaces Aristotele's: this is a consequence
of the cultural and technological needs expressed by the bourgeoisy
- One of the scientist who best interprets this change is Nicholas of Cusa
- Nicholas of Cusa is both a theologist and a scientist
- He strives to interpret the real world in terms of mathematical relationships and measurements
- As a result he fabricates many useful inventions -> our better understanding of the physical world
also produces technological advancements
- These are big qualitative differences with respect to Pythagora
- In a 200 years span there are
marking the birth of modern
physics and cosmology
- (1) Copernicus: from
geocentric to heliocentric cosmological model ->
emphasis on symmetry , simplicity , and beauty of
the model
- (2) Brahe: vast collection of data
on cosmological observations -> emphasis on advancement through experimental/empirical observations
- (3) Kepler: from circular to elliptical planetary orbits (to be discussed next week)
- (4) Newton: one fundamental
physical law explains it all (to be discussed next week)
-
All of these beautiful advancements are conducted while, with very few exceptions, women are nowhere in site. Why? Who -- which social class(es) -- benefits from
these discoveries and how?