next up previous contents
Next: Electron polarimetry and Møller Up: CEBAF PROPOSAL The Charge Previous: Low-current operation

Compensation for Target Field Effects

When using a polarized target, the holding field deflects all charged particles entering and exiting the target. For the tex2html_wrap_inline1804 case of interest, the holding field is in the scattering plane, in the direction perpendicular to tex2html_wrap_inline1410 . The field has a component perpendicular to both the incident and scattered electron directions and results in small, yet significant deflections. This deflection of the electrons is minimized by performing the experiment at the highest incident energy (which corresponds to the smallest angle) possible. This at the same time yields the greatest the figure of merit for a fixed luminosity. For the energies and angles listed in Table 1 the maximum deflection for the incident electron in traversing a target field of 1.34 T-m is 4.3 tex2html_wrap_inline1808 . For the scattered electron the maximum deflection is less than 3.3 tex2html_wrap_inline1808 .

Unless compensated for the deflection of the incident and final electrons can be troublesome. When the beam is deflected down, the scattering plane is tilted such that tex2html_wrap_inline1410 points toward the floor. The angular direction of tex2html_wrap_inline1410 relative to the laboratory floor, tex2html_wrap_inline1816 , is given by

displaymath322

where tex2html_wrap_inline1818 is the beam deflection angle. At high energies and small angles a small incident beam deflection is magnified, resulting in a large deflection of tex2html_wrap_inline1410 . For example, at Q tex2html_wrap_inline1822 , tex2html_wrap_inline1824 and tex2html_wrap_inline1826 . Since the scattered electron is deflected vertically as well, the scattering plane has a significant tilt with respect to the floor. To detect the neutron along tex2html_wrap_inline1410 at a tex2html_wrap_inline1290 = 2, the neutron detector at 8 meters from the target would be 1 meter below the horizontal. Further complications arise since the angle of the spectrometer, tex2html_wrap_inline1832 is different from the true scattering angle when the beam is deflected. This difference between tex2html_wrap_inline1504 and tex2html_wrap_inline1832 is greatest in the forward direction.

CEBAF has designed a chicane[22] in coordination with this collaboration in order to compensate for the effects of the target field. This chicane is designed such as to obtain a horizontal incident beam at the center of the polarized target. The gap of the magnet will be large enough (2.5cm and 3.8cm for BE and BZ, respectively) to allow for rastering of the beam. The width of the poles is such that the chicane can be used over a large range of incident energies; also, very small deflections (where the chicane magnets can be used to correct the alignment of the incident beam) are possible without mechanical rearrangement of the chicane. The upstream chicane magnets will be part of the initial complement of equipment in Hall C. The downstream chicane will direct the incident beam towards the beam dump.

The chicane is shown schematically in Figure 7. The magnets contracts have been awarded and the magnets should be delivered by September 1993.

  figure334
Figure 7: The Hall C chicane. Also indicated is the beam rastering system which will be available when Hall C is ready for beam. Not shown are the beam position monitors and beam current monitors.  


next up previous contents
Next: Electron polarimetry and Møller Up: CEBAF PROPOSAL The Charge Previous: Low-current operation

Donal Day, University of Virginia